Long-term performance comparison of bipolar active vs. quadripolar passive fixation leads in cardiac resynchronisation therapy
- \(\bf Background:\) Bipolar active fixation (BipolarAFL) and quadripolar passive fixation left-ventricular leads (QuadPFL) have been designed to reduce the risk of phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS), enable targeted left-ventricular pacing, and overcome problems of difficult coronary venous anatomy and lead dislodgment. This study sought to report the long-term safety and performance of a BipolarAFL, Medtronic Attain Stability 20066, compared to QuadPFL. \(\bf Methods:\) We performed a single-operator retrospective analysis of 81 patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) (36 BipolarAFL, 45 QuadPFL). Immediate implant data and electrical and clinical data during follow-up (FU) were analyzed. \(\bf Results:\) BipolarAFL has been chosen in patients with significantly larger estimated vein diameter (at the lead tip: 7.2 \(\pm\) 4.1 Fr vs. 4.1 \(\pm\) 2.3 Fr, \(\it p\) < 0.001) without significant time difference until the final lead position was achieved (BipolarAFL: 20.9 \(\pm\) 10.5 min, vs. QuadPFL: 18.9 \(\pm\) 8.9 min, \(\it p\) = 0.35). At 12 month FU no difference in response rate to CRT was recorded between BipolarAFL and QuadPFL according to left ventricular end-systolic volume (61.1 vs. 60.0%, \(\it p\) = 0.82) and New York Heart Association (66.7 vs. 62.2%, \(\it p\) = 0.32). At median FU of 48 months (IQR: 44–54), no lead dislodgment occurred in both groups but a significantly higher proportion of PNS was recorded in QuadPFL (13 vs. 0%, \(\it p\) < 0.05). Electrical parameters were stable during FU in both groups without significant differences. \(\it Conclusion:\) BipolarAFL can be implanted with ease in challenging coronary venous anatomy, shows excellent electrical performance and no difference in clinical outcome compared to QuadPFL.
Author: | Fabian SchiedatGND, Harilaos BogossianGND, Dominik SchöneGND, Assem AweimerORCiDGND, Polykarpos C. PatsalisORCiDGND, Christoph HanefeldGND, Andreas MüggeORCiDGND, Axel KloppeORCiDGND |
---|---|
URN: | urn:nbn:de:hbz:294-87161 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.734666 |
Parent Title (English): | Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine |
Publisher: | Frontiers Media |
Place of publication: | Lausanne |
Document Type: | Article |
Language: | English |
Date of Publication (online): | 2022/03/15 |
Date of first Publication: | 2021/11/22 |
Publishing Institution: | Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsbibliothek |
Tag: | Open Access Fonds active fixation; biventricular pacing; cardiac resynchronisation therapy; lead dislodgement; left ventricular lead |
Volume: | 8 |
Issue: | Article 734666 |
First Page: | 734666-1 |
Last Page: | 734666-9 |
Note: | Article Processing Charge funded by the Open Access Publication Fund of Ruhr-Universität Bochum. |
Note: | DOI nicht auflösbar! Link zur Verlagsseite des Artikels: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.734666/full |
Institutes/Facilities: | Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil, Medizinische Klinik II, Kardiologie und Angiologie |
Dewey Decimal Classification: | Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / Medizin, Gesundheit |
open_access (DINI-Set): | open_access |
Licence (English): | Creative Commons - CC BY 4.0 - Attribution 4.0 International |