Mischaracterization reconsidered

  • According to the mischaracterization objection developed by Max Deutsch and Herman Cappelen, philosophers do not appeal to intuitions as evidence for their judgments about thought experiment cases, but rather argue for their case judgments. Although Deutsch and Cappelen present numerous case studies in support of this claim, the reception of the mischaracterization objection has been surprisingly negative so far. In this paper, I will first clarify and elaborate the mischaracterization objection, explain its metaphilosophical significance, and then argue that all extant replies to it fail. The mischaracterization objection is therefore much stronger than it is widely assumed to be, with potentially far-reaching metaphilosophical consequences for the restrictionist challenge from experimental philosophy and the philosophical import of intuitions about hypothetical cases.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Joachim HorvathORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:hbz:294-86739
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2021.2019894
Parent Title (English):Inquiry
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2022/03/03
Date of first Publication:2022/02/03
Publishing Institution:Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsbibliothek
Tag:Method of cases; argument view; case judgments; intuitions; mischaracterization objection; thought experiments
First Page:1
Last Page:40
Institutes/Facilities:Institut für Philosophie II
Dewey Decimal Classification:Philosophie und Psychologie / Philosophie
open_access (DINI-Set):open_access
faculties:Fakultät für Philosophie und Erziehungswissenschaft
Licence (English):License LogoCreative Commons - CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 - Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International