What’s wrong with evolutionary causation?

  • This review essay reflects on recent discussions in evolutionary biology and philosophy of science on the central causes of evolution and the structure of causal explanations in evolutionary theory. In this debate, it has been argued that our view of evolutionary causation should be rethought by including more seriously developmental causes and causes of the individual acting organism. I use Tobias Uller’s and Kevin Laland’s volume \(\textit {Evolutionary Causation}\) as well as recent reviews of it as a starting point to reflect on the causal role of agency, individuality, and the environment in evolution. In addition, I critically discuss classical philosophical frameworks of theory change (i.e. Popper’s, Kuhn’s and Lakatos’) used in this debate to understand changing views of evolutionary causation.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Jan BaedkeORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:hbz:294-79425
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-020-09381-0
Parent Title (English):Acta Biotheoretica
Publisher:Springer Nature
Place of publication:Berlin
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2021/03/11
Date of first Publication:2020/04/13
Publishing Institution:Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsbibliothek
Tag:Agency; Environment; Evolutionary causation; Individuality; Kuhn; Lakatos; Popper
Volume:69
First Page:79
Last Page:89
Note:
Dieser Beitrag ist auf Grund des DEAL-Springer-Vertrages frei zugänglich.
Institutes/Facilities:Institut für Philosophie I
Dewey Decimal Classification:Philosophie und Psychologie / Philosophie
open_access (DINI-Set):open_access
Licence (English):License LogoCreative Commons - CC BY 4.0 - Attribution 4.0 International