What’s wrong with evolutionary causation?
- This review essay reflects on recent discussions in evolutionary biology and philosophy of science on the central causes of evolution and the structure of causal explanations in evolutionary theory. In this debate, it has been argued that our view of evolutionary causation should be rethought by including more seriously developmental causes and causes of the individual acting organism. I use Tobias Uller’s and Kevin Laland’s volume \(\textit {Evolutionary Causation}\) as well as recent reviews of it as a starting point to reflect on the causal role of agency, individuality, and the environment in evolution. In addition, I critically discuss classical philosophical frameworks of theory change (i.e. Popper’s, Kuhn’s and Lakatos’) used in this debate to understand changing views of evolutionary causation.
Author: | Jan BaedkeORCiDGND |
---|---|
URN: | urn:nbn:de:hbz:294-79425 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-020-09381-0 |
Parent Title (English): | Acta Biotheoretica |
Publisher: | Springer Nature |
Place of publication: | Berlin |
Document Type: | Article |
Language: | English |
Date of Publication (online): | 2021/03/11 |
Date of first Publication: | 2020/04/13 |
Publishing Institution: | Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsbibliothek |
Tag: | Agency; Environment; Evolutionary causation; Individuality; Kuhn; Lakatos; Popper |
Volume: | 69 |
First Page: | 79 |
Last Page: | 89 |
Note: | Dieser Beitrag ist auf Grund des DEAL-Springer-Vertrages frei zugänglich. |
Institutes/Facilities: | Institut für Philosophie I |
Dewey Decimal Classification: | Philosophie und Psychologie / Philosophie |
open_access (DINI-Set): | open_access |
Licence (English): | Creative Commons - CC BY 4.0 - Attribution 4.0 International |